Prompt

  1. Read Writing about Movies, pages 55–100, to learn about the different types of cultural analysis.
  2. Select only one film from the following list:
    • In the Year of the Pig (Emile de Antonio, 1968) available ~on Kanopy~
    • F for Fake (Orson Welles, 1973) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Style Wars (Tony Silver, 1983) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Los Sures (Diego Echeverria, 1984) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Stop Making Sense (Jonathan Demme, 1984) available on DVD ~at Pratt Library~
    • Sherman’s March (Ross McElwee, 1985) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Paris is Burning (Jennie Livingston, 1990) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Helvetica: Typography, Graphic Design and Global Visual Culture (Gary Hustwit, 2007) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Concerning Violence: Nine Scenes from the Anti-Imperialistic Self-Defense (Göran Olsson, 2014) available ~on Kanopy~
    • The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution (Stanley Nelson, 2015), available ~on Alexander Street~
    • Forgetting Vietnam: A Film Essay Commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War (Trịnh T. Minh-hà, 2015) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Class Divide: Effects of Gentrification in West Chelsea, NYC (Marc Levin, 2016) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Whose Streets?: An Unflinching Look at the Ferguson Uprising (Sabaah Folayan, 2017) available ~on Kanopy~
    • LA 92 (T.J. Martin and Daniel Lindsay, 2017), find where to stream ~on Just Watch~
    • Ex Libris: The New York Public Library (Frederick Wiseman, 2017) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Detroit 48202: Conversations Along a Postal Route (Pam Sporn, 2018) available ~on Kanopy~
    • Born to Be (Tania Cypriano, 2019) available ~on Kanopy~
  3. Write a 250-word cultural analysis of the film you selected: what does this film tell us about the society and culture of the film at the time it was made? Answering one of the following two questions and be sure to write at least one paragraph on a sequence that illustrates your overall analysis.
    1. How does the film represent represent certain characters according to one of these cultural analytic dimensions?
      • socioeconomic status
      • gender
      • race, ethnicity, national origin
      • sexual orientation
    2. What genre does this film belong to? Which two characteristics make it so?
      • story formulas
      • themes
      • character types
      • setting
      • presentation and iconic imagery
      • stars

Refer to the sample cultural analysis below for guidance.

Sample Cultural Analysis

Race, Ethnicity, and National Origin in The Atomic Cafe

The Atomic Cafe (1982) is a compilation film that includes footage from government films that were used to promote the nuclear bomb during the 1940s and 1950s. The films that constitute The Atomic Cafe offer misleading information—if not outright lies—about the dangers of atomic weapons in defending the “American way of life.”

The film addresses race, ethnicity, and national origin through its use of decades-old films that present American superiority at the expense of other cultures or nation’s interests. The atomic bomb was presented as a solution for the United States’s security, without regard for the safety of the rest of the world. We see this attitude presented in two sequences.

The first sequence is the one that chronicles the bombing of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In this sequence, we see the aftermath of the bombings, expressed through an interview with one of the pilots and a celebratory gathering after Japan surrendered to the Allies. This footage expresses the euphoria of the victory through an American perspective. But the sequence extends to include footage of the destruction that the atomic bombs left in their wake. By including this footage, the filmmakers make a point about the human toll of this victory, countering the idea that Japanese lives didn’t matter as suggested by the earlier footage.

The second sequence is the one that shows the testing on Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands. In this sequence, we see a map of where the testing took place. The sounds accompanying this image is of people signing a song in a language that is unrecognizable to English speakers, but likely the language of the people of Bikini Atoll. The image switches to an image of people waving at the camera, and the voiceover narrator announces that “the natives express to the people of the United States their welcome.” This sequence continues in this fashion, suggesting that the nuclear tests that would make their homes uninhabitable were welcomed by the people of Bikini Atoll. This viewpoint, expressed through the long shot camerawork, treats them, not as individuals, but as willing participants in the development of nuclear weapons.

In both sequences, we can see how American’s development and deployment of nuclear weapons reflected the contemporaneous viewpoint that non-American lives did not matter, except to advance American goals. With the filmmakers including more footage to challenge that idea, the film argues that many years later, we could be mindful about the ignorance of that thinking.